a super unspecific umbrella term, it gets thrown around as a moral judgement, and it's just not terribly useful. It obscures messiness and complexity, and its moralising incarnation in particular closes off possibilities. If a specific type of fic makes us uncomfortable, that's fine. We don't have to read it. Or we could examine the source of that discomfort. We can critique it, and look for the good or bad it might do in the world. We can look for and critique the community structures that have produced it,â Popova says at the end of our interview. âThose are much more productive ways of dealing with that discomfort than just labelling it âdark fic.â But I also suspect we're at a point in fannish history where getting to that place requires significant cultural change. And the tools and platforms we currently have aren't conducive to that. But that's a bigger question for another day. In the meantime I think it's worth repeating: There are things we can do in gutters that we can't do in gardens.â axilus In short: âNo, we can't make moral judgements about individuals based on their interest in âdark fic,ââ Popova says. That doesnât mean we canât analyze and think critically about the communities weâre part of, and the impact of fan-created art on those communities. âWe can point to tropes, fandoms, or communities that carefully, thoughtfully explore consent through fiction about incest, rape, or the Omegaverse,â they say, citing their bookDubcon axilus by comedians. But it wasn’t until Friday, March 29, that someone who experienced it spoke out publicly. axilus I couldn't give [the attacks and misrepresentations] too much thought because if I did I would never speak out and frankly, no woman would ever speak out. I stay focused on why this conversation is important and on all of those women who have chosen to share their own stories. They're finally talking about it. And that was the point.Related: axilus
| Full Name: | |
| Title: | |
| Description: | |
| Rating Value: | |
| Time: | 2025-12-21 14:39:53 |